Categories
Uncategorized

Bridgerton: Entertainment I don’t Want to Have to Think About

(tw: sexual assault) Bridgerton was an interesting watch. My mother and I watched it together in one sitting after she put on a random show to watch during a workout on her stationary bike (it was kind of weird when we reached the sexy stuff, but by then we were invested), and at the time it was lovely. The netfilx original served as a rollercoaster of an experience that was silly enough not to need deep thought while still be an entertaining escape from quarentine. My mom and I had a great time laughing at our theories about what would happen next, thirsting over the duke, and hoping the characters could solve their problems and get together already! For the most part the show was fun, but towards the end the need to keep the tone of the show light and something to escape to caused important moments, choices, and dynamics to be glossed over in away that takes very little thought to tinge that enjoyment with some disgust.

How Bridgerton Handles the Book's Wildly Controversial Scene | Vanity Fair

Though the unexplained race dynamics (is this a race-blind world or not?), the pattern of casting light skin characters as likable characters and dark skin actors as the villains, and skirting around the realities of privilege in the world of Bridgerton all come to mind, what is likely the most egregious example is how Daphne and Simon’s relationship is depicted after they get married – after (many scenes of) a very sexual honeymoon period, Daphne learns of the mechanics of conception. This causes her to realize that her new husband lied to her – he is not actually infertile but has been using the pullout method to prevent her from getting pregnant and Daphne didn’t know enough about sex before marrying him to know that’s what he was doing. What Daphne didn’t know was that when Simon said he could not have children, he was referring to a vow he made to his father, who mistreated him as a child, not a physical condition.

At this point, as an audience member, I was on Daphne’s side. It was a cathartic moment of the character finally realizing what the audience already knew, and I was on the edge of my seat to see how she reacted. I expected a new string of events that would finally allow Simon to resolve the backstory responsible for the character flaws that had plagued him so far. Instead, I was treated to a very sudden rape scene: Daphne marches into the master bedroom, engages Simon in more sexy time, and at the last second overpowers him to force him to complete the deed still inside her while he struggles against her.

How Netflix's 'Bridgerton' Adapted 'The Duke And I's Most Controversial Sex  Scene

For the sake of argument, there are a few reasons that this choice could be, well maybe not a good one but maybe an effective one. One possibility is the idea that it introduces an opportunity to examine the danger of inadequate sex education and how people who love each other can hurt each other when information not available. Another is that Daphne’s redemtion and the rehabilitation of relationship after this could be a compelling story. Unfortunately neither of these directions are followed.

27 Reasons This Is The Best "Bridgerton" Episode

Daphne is never held accountable for how she hurt Simon, nor is her choice ever acknowledged as rape, or even something wrong. Instead, only Simon is challenged, not even for lying to Daphne but for not wanting children to begin with. By including the rape scene very serious ideas were introduced to the show, Simon’s stance on children was not the thing that needed to be examined at the moment.

Not enought time was alloted to detangling the drama introduced by the scene. The second to last episode of an otherwise thoughtless show is not the time to introduce a complication this serious. There was no time for the characters to really understand where each other was coming from, for Simon to react to being violeted the way he was, for Daphne to recognize the harm she’s done, for growth to occur, for me to get back on board with this relationship. Instead, the show ignores the issues it introduces and tries to uphold the lighthearted drama vibe it had established earlier without resolving them. A happy childbirth scene in an epilogue scene a year later is not the satisfying conclusion this development demands.

One reply on “Bridgerton: Entertainment I don’t Want to Have to Think About”

Keyra,

(tw: sexual assault) I am so glad you decided to make your post about this! I have been wanting to talk about it since winter break, and my roommate got tired of hearing about my Bridgerton grievances after Week 1.

I also had a great time watching the first part of the show. It had so much going for it; Regency-era drama, hot people, and crazy-inaccurate but gorgeous costumes. At times, I found Daphne and her condescending-older-sister/poor-little-me routine occasionally a bit much. (I’m sorry, is the problem here that you’re white, beautiful, rich enough not to need marriage and loved so much that your mom wants you to marry for love? Also, what was UP with those bangs??) Nevertheless, I was ready to root for her.

In the genre of “bodice-ripping” Regency novels, I find the troupe of the young, sexual ingenue really irritating and was excited for it to be dismantled in this series. As anyone who has ever seen a grocery store romance novel can attest, these women–no, girls really–are typically depicted as lambs to the slaughter, designed to be devoured by the men in their lives. Their general confusion, reluctance, or downright refusal is displayed as an important part of their charm and worth as women, and seems to make them sexier in the eyes of the older, more sexually experienced men in their lives. (I tried to include an example book cover, but it won’t let me.)

In Bridgerton, I was happy to see a young woman asking questions about her own sexuality, and getting angry at the people who were supposed to prepare and educate her. What I was not ready for was for her to over-correct all the way into sexual assault.

After doing a little research, I discovered that in the books, the case was even more egregious. Simon was drunk and asleep (?!) when the assault occured, and therefore clearly unable to consent. It’s apparent that the Shondaland showrunners knew they had to address this problem, as this scene has been a controversial one since the book came out in 2000. However, the way they approached the plot point in the series felt like an attempt at a dominant understanding and positioning of a #girlboss #takethepower moment. Instead, it was a huge miss, and tried to justify something I could no longer root for.

Leave a Reply

css.php